Product governance · AI era · August 2026

Three teams. Three tools. Nobody knows who made the call.

Your team just shipped AI-generated code. Can you prove a human reviewed it?

August 2nd. EU AI Act enforceable. Your product team has no audit trail.

The feature shipped wrong. The decision was made. It just wasn't written down.

Works with FIGMA CLAUDE CODE CURSOR GITHUB JIRA · LINEAR NOTION

The problem

THREE TEAMS.
THREE VERSIONS
OF THE TRUTH.

AI is accelerating every pillar independently. But nobody built the layer that connects them — or answers who is responsible when something goes wrong.

01
Context dies at every handoff
The requirement that motivated the design. The design decision that constrained the build. None of it travels. Every person downstream fills the gap with an assumption — and assumptions become bugs.
PM → Design → Eng
02
Nobody owns the decision
Roles are blurring. PMs generate designs. Designers write specs. Developers make product calls. AI does all three. When something ships wrong, nobody can answer who was responsible.
Ownership unclear
03
AI contributions are invisible
Your team uses Claude Code, Figma AI, and Copilot to build. Under the EU AI Act — enforceable August 2, 2026 — you must prove human oversight of every AI-generated output. Most teams cannot.
EU AI Act · Aug 2026
04
Leaders have no full picture
VPs spend Monday mornings assembling status from five tools, three standups, and a dozen Slack threads. The full picture has always existed. Nobody connected it — until now.
Visibility · Leadership

See Plenio

ONE VIEW.
EVERY TEAM.

Watch how Plenio connects your pipeline, surfaces gaps, and gives every stakeholder exactly what they need to see.

Product walkthrough · 3 min
PLENIO · DEMO v1.0 plenio.io 2026
91%
of developers say handoffs need improvement — in 2026, with every tool available
€15M
maximum EU AI Act penalty for failing to prove human oversight of AI-generated outputs
Aug 2
EU AI Act enforcement date 2026 — can your product team produce the audit trail today?

How it works

THE LAYER ABOVE
YOUR EXISTING TOOLS.

Plenio reads from Figma, Jira, GitHub, and Notion. It never replaces them. It connects them — and adds the governance layer that was always missing.

01
Connected pipeline
Every feature across all five stages — Spec, Design, Review, Build, Ship — visible to every pillar simultaneously. Every requirement linked to the screen that addresses it. Every screen linked to the component that implements it.
Figma · Jira · GitHub · Notion
02
Ownership clarity
For every item at every stage — who owns this decision right now? Explicitly declared. Permanently logged. Visible to everyone. When something ships wrong the record exists. When roles blur, ownership stays clear.
Dynamic · Logged · Auditable
03
AI-generated handoff
When design is ready, Plenio generates a complete handoff package automatically. Every requirement linked. Missing states flagged. Design intent documented. Dev receives full context — not just a Figma link.
Auto-generated · Complete · Traceable
PLENIO  /  Fintech dashboard · Q2 sprint  /  Feature detail
EU AI ACT READY SOC 2
Pipeline
Feature detail
Audit log
Compliance export
Features in flight 6 active
Payment flow redesign 2 GAPS
DESIGN · day 4
SR
JM
Claude Design
Onboarding v3 ON TRACK
BUILD · day 2
PK
TW
Claude Code
API rate limit UI BLOCKED
REVIEW · day 6
MN
Copilot
Error state library IN SPEC
SPEC · day 1
SR
Dashboard empty states SHIPPED
SHIP · Apr 18
JM
PK
Mobile nav rework NO OWNER
DESIGN · day 3
?
Figma AI
Payment flow redesign
Jira #PAY-441 · created Apr 10 · 4 requirements · 2 gaps detected
DESIGN → BUILD
SR
Stage timeline
SPEC
JM
James · done
DESIGN
SR
Sara R. · active
REVIEW
unassigned
BUILD
waiting
QA · SHIP
—
Decision ownership
INTENT
JM
James M. · PM ✓ declared
UX
SR
Sara R. · Designer ✓ declared Claude Design
TECH
?
unassigned ⚠ missing
QA
?
unassigned ⚠ missing
Gap detection · live
Error state — not designed
Requirement #3 specifies payment failure handling. No error screen exists in Figma. Blocks dev handoff.
Tech decision owner — unassigned
No engineer has declared ownership of this feature. EU AI Act requires named human oversight before build starts.
Loading skeleton — missing
Async payment processing requires a loading state. Not defined. Similar features produced QA failures 73% of the time without this.
Review stage — no owner assigned
Design review cannot proceed without a declared owner. Feature has been at design for 4 days — exceeds team average of 2.8 days.
4/4 requirements linked to screens
All PRD requirements from Jira #PAY-441 are mapped to Figma frames.
Mobile breakpoint — specified
375px and 768px breakpoints defined. EU AI Act audit trail includes this decision record.
EU AI Act · Art. 11, 12, 14
✓
Art. 11 · Technical documentation logged
✓
Art. 12 · AI contributions auto-recorded
✗
Art. 14 · Human oversight — tech owner missing
!
Audit export — blocked until gaps resolved
AI contribution log
Claude Design Generated initial payment screens · Apr 14 · 3 frames ✓ Sara R.
Figma AI Auto-layout applied to card components · Apr 15 ✓ Sara R.
Claude PRD requirements generated · Apr 10 ✓ James M.

Early access

GET
THE FULL
PICTURE.

We are selecting the first 10 design partner teams — companies that help shape Plenio and get early access before public launch.

White-glove onboarding included
Significant early-access pricing
Direct input into the product roadmap
EU AI Act compliance documentation included

No credit card · EU-compliant · On-prem available

Have questions? Talk to the founder.

Join the waitlist

We are selecting the first 10 design partner teams. Enter your details and we will be in touch within 48 hours.

Get in touch

Talk to the founder — whether you are a potential customer, investor, or technical co-founder.